Are Leibnizian ‘Monads’ Complex?

fso9aa

One crucial characteristic of complexity (complex systems) is the ignorance of any element constituting the system about the system as a whole, in that, if it were known to the element, the whole of complexity would be resident in the element in question begging the metaphysical question concerning the consciousness of the whole residing in an unit/part. Taking into account the non-linearity of the system, this ignorance turns into bliss, as complexity starts to emerge as a result of the patterns of interaction between the constituting elements. But, there might seem some similarity between the Leibnizian monads and elements, would the non-monadic characters of the elements constituting the system. The Leibnizian monads are subject to their own laws following individualism as a key property, non-interactive in nature and most importantly reflect the entire universe. The elements in the complex systems abhor these qualities. The monads are metaphysical, whereas, the elements shun the tag. Monads have ontological existence lying in their irreducible simplicity, a commonality with the elements constituting the complex systems, but get differentiated in their apparent interactions as compared with the real interactions for the elements.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s