Skip to content
  • Home

AltExploit

Schoolboy Errors: Rhizomatic Dysphoria ∃! Machinic Kernel Panic: The Maximalist Politic of Self

Tag: financial securities

For No Arbitrage Opportunities to Exist, Investment Strategy Must be a Martingale. (Didactic 2)

April 12, 2017 AltExploit1 Comment

fig2

We postulate the existence of a stochastic discount factor (SDF) that prices all assets in this economy and denote it by M. This process is also termed the pricing kernel, the pricing operator, or the state price density. It is well known that assuming that no dynamic arbitrage trading strategies can be implemented by trading in the financial securities issued in the economy is roughly equivalent to the existence of a strictly positive SDF. For no arbitrage opportunities to exist, the product of M with the value process of any investment strategy must be a martingale. Technically, recall that a martingale is a family of random variables ξ(t) such that the mathematical expectation of the increment ξ(t2)−ξ(t1) (for arbitrary t1 < t2), conditioned on the past values ξ(s) (s ≤ t1), is zero. The drift of a martingale is thus zero. This is different from the Markov process, which is better known in the physical community, defined by the independence of the next increment on past values.

Under an adequate definition of the space of admissible trading strategies, the product MV is a martingale, where V is the value process of any admissible self-financing trading strategy implemented by trading on financial securities. Then,

V(t) = EtV(s) M(s)/M(t) —– (1)

where s is a future date and Et[x] denotes the mathematical expectation of x taken at time t. In particular, we require that a bank account and zero-coupon discount bonds of all maturities satisfy this condition.

A security is referred to as a (floating-rate) bank account, if it is “locally riskless”. Thus, the value at time t, of an initial investment of B(0) units in the bank account that is continuously reinvested, is given by the following process

B(t) = B(0) exp{∫0t r(s)ds} —– (2)

where r(t) is the instantaneous nominal interest rate.

We further assume that, at any time t, riskless discount bonds of all maturity dates trade in this economy and let P (t,s) denote the time t price of the s maturity bond. We require that P (s,s) = 1, that P (t,s) > 0 and that ∂P(t,s)/∂s exists.

Instantaneous forward rates at time t for all times-to-maturity x > 0, f(t,x), are defined by

f(t,x)=−∂logP(t,t+x)/∂x —– (3)

which is the rate that can be contracted at time t for instantaneously riskless borrowing or lending at time t + x. We require that the initial forward curve f (0,x), for all x, be continuous.

Equivalently, from the knowledge of the instantaneous forward rates for all times- to-maturity between 0 and time s − t, the price at time t of a bond with maturity s

can be obtained by

P(t,s) = exp {−∫0s−t f(t,x)dx} —– (4)

Forward rates thus fully represent the information in the prices of all zero-coupon bonds. The spot interest rate at time t, r(t), is the instantaneous forward rate at time t with time-to-maturity 0,

r(t) = f(t,0) —– (5)

For convenience, we model the dynamics of forward rates. Clearly, we could as well model the dynamics of bond prices directly, or even the dynamics of the yields to maturity of the zero-coupon bonds. We use forward rates with fixed time-to-maturity rather than fixed maturity date. The model of HJM starts from processes for forward rates with a fixed maturity date. This is different from what we do. If we use a “hat” to denote the forward rates modeled by HJM,

fˆ(t,s) = f (t,s−t) —– (6)

or, equivalently,

fˆ(t,x) = f(t,t+x) —– (7)

for fixed s. Brace and Musiela define forward rates in the same fashion. Miltersen, Sandmann and Sondermann, and Brace, Gatarek and Musiela use definitions of forward rates similarly, albeit for non-instantaneous forward rates. Modelling forward rates with fixed time-to-maturity is more natural for thinking of the dynamics of the entire forward curve as the shape of a string evolving in time. In contrast, in HJM, forward rate processes disappear as time reaches their maturities. Note, however, that we still impose the martingale condition on bonds with fixed maturity date, since these are the financial instruments that are actually traded.

Proliferate

  • Tweet
  • Share on Tumblr
  • WhatsApp
  • More
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
Follow AltExploit on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Recent Posts

  • Solah Rahi Tej Talab, Rewari, Haryana (सोलहराही तेज़ तालाब, रेवाड़ी, हरियाणा) February 22, 2022
  • Union Budget 2021-22 and Coal..(Preliminary Thoughts) February 2, 2021
  • Coal and India in it’s Union Budget 2020-21. Is India really serious about its Climate Change commitments? February 1, 2020
  • Schematic Grothendieck Representation December 26, 2019
  • The Code of Capital or the Legal Structure of Finance – How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality with Katharina Pistor December 17, 2019
  • The Polity Today December 16, 2019
  • I, the Citizen, or You, the Citizen December 14, 2019
  • An Ode to a Silent Communicator… December 4, 2019
  • How Long Do I? November 8, 2019
  • Black Hole Entropy in terms of Mass. Note Quote. October 30, 2019
  • Derrida Contra Searle – Intentionality – Part 2… October 24, 2019
  • Derrida Contra Searle – Part 1… October 17, 2019
  • Derrida Contra Austin – Irreducible Polysemy… October 10, 2019
  • The Jukebox… October 7, 2019
  • An Unfinished Story… October 5, 2019
  • Sedition October 4, 2019
  • Catastrophe, Gestalt and Thom’s Natural Philosophy of 3-D Space as Underlying All Abstract Forms – Thought of the Day 157.0 October 3, 2019

Search

Accelerationism alt-right Artificial Intelligence Banking category theory complexity DarkNet Economics Finance Governance Heritage Walks Mathematics Neural Network philosophy Philosophy of Science political theory psychoanalysis Psychology and Political Science Taxation Thought of the Day Uncategorized Viral Art

Archives

  • February 2022 (1)
  • February 2021 (1)
  • February 2020 (1)
  • December 2019 (5)
  • November 2019 (1)
  • October 2019 (8)
  • September 2019 (7)
  • August 2019 (1)
  • July 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (2)
  • May 2019 (2)
  • April 2019 (4)
  • February 2019 (3)
  • January 2019 (6)
  • December 2018 (5)
  • November 2018 (5)
  • October 2018 (5)
  • September 2018 (10)
  • August 2018 (4)
  • July 2018 (6)
  • June 2018 (5)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (4)
  • March 2018 (10)
  • February 2018 (4)
  • January 2018 (20)
  • December 2017 (10)
  • November 2017 (25)
  • October 2017 (35)
  • September 2017 (39)
  • August 2017 (41)
  • July 2017 (69)
  • June 2017 (81)
  • May 2017 (93)
  • April 2017 (83)
  • March 2017 (117)
  • February 2017 (43)
  • January 2017 (59)
  • December 2016 (82)

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

RSS Feed RSS - Comments

July 2022
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Feb    

Follow me on Twitter

My Tweets
Website Powered by WordPress.com.
Back to top
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • AltExploit
    • Join 159 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • AltExploit
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: