Conjuncted: Twistor Spaces May 17, 2017 himanshu damleLeave a comment The α-planes can be generalized to a suitable class of curved complex space-times. By a complex space-time (M,g) we mean a four-dimensional Hausdorff manifold M with holomorphic metric g. Thus, with respect to a holomorphic coordinate basis xa, g is a 4×4 matrix of holomorphic functions of xa, and its determinant is nowhere-vanishing. Remarkably, g determines a unique holomorphic connection ∇, and a holomorphic curvature tensor Rabcd. Moreover, the Ricci tensor Rab becomes complex-valued, and the Weyl tensor Cabcd may be split into independent holomorphic tensors, i.e. its self-dual and anti-self-dual parts, respectively. With our two-spinor notation, one has Cabcd = ψABCD εA′B′ εC′D′ + ψ~A′B′C′D′ εAB εCD where ψABCD = ψ(ABCD), ψA′B′C′D′ = ψ~(A′B′C′D′). The spinors ψ and ψ~ are the anti-self-dual and self-dual Weyl spinors, respectively. ψ~A′B′C′D′ = 0, Rab = 0, are called right-flat or anti-self-dual, whereas complex vacuum space-times such that ψABCD = 0, Rab = 0, are called left-flat or self-dual. This definition only makes sense if space-time is complex or real Riemannian, since in this case no complex conjugation relates primed to unprimed spinors (i.e. the corresponding spin-spaces are no longer anti-isomorphic). Hence, for example, the self-dual Weyl spinor ψ~A′B′C′D′ may vanish without its anti-self-dual counterpart ψABCD having to vanish as well, or the converse may hold. By definition, α-surfaces are complex two-surfaces S in a complex space-time (M, g) whose tangent vectors v have the two-spinor form, where λA is varying, and πA′ is a fixed primed spinor field on S. From this definition, the following properties can be derived: (i) tangent vectors to α-surfaces are null; (ii) any two null tangent vectors v and u to an α-surface are orthogonal to one another; (iii) the holomorphic metric g vanishes on S in that g(v, u) = g(v, v) = 0, ∀ v, u, so that α-surfaces are totally null; (iv) α-surfaces are self-dual, in that F ≡ v ⊗ u − u ⊗ v takes the two-spinor form; (v) α-surfaces exist in (M,g) iff the self-dual Weyl spinor vanishes, so that (M, g) is anti-self-dual. The properties (i)–(iv), are the same as in the flat-space-time case, provided we replace the flat metric η with the curved metric g. Condition (v), however, is a peculiarity of curved space-times. We want to prove that, if (M,g) is anti-self-dual, it admits a three-complex- parameter family of self-dual α-surfaces. Indeed, given any point p ∈ M and a spinor μA′ at p, one can find a spinor field πA′ on M, satisfying the equation πA′ ∇AA′ πB′ = ξAπB′, and such that πA′(p) = μA′(p) Hence πA′ defines a holomorphic two-dimensional distribution, spanned by the vector fields of the form λAπA′, which is integrable. Thus, in particular, there exists a self-dual α-surface through p, with tangent vectors of the form λAμA′ at p. Since p is arbitrary, this argument may be repeated ∀p ∈ M. The space P of all self-dual α-surfaces in (M,g) is three-complex-dimensional, and is called twistor space of (M, g). ProliferateTweetRedditShare on TumblrWhatsAppMoreEmailLike Loading...